LABOUR RUN COUNCIL is starting a scheme to turn off 2000 street lights in Kirklees.
Do we really live in a country where we can’t afford to provide street lighting to our citizens? The environmental argument doesn’t wash; this is purely about cost cutting. Good street lighting reduces crime, it makes the public feel safe and it reduces the risk of road traffic accidents.
Residents have expressed to me concerns that it will encourage vandalism and burglary. For many people, particularly those who live on their own, it will be very intimidating. Kirklees should be looking at more environmentally friendly lighting technology.
Motoring organisations have also warned that the changes could increase the number of road accidents.
The AA, said: “There is concern that some local authorities appear to be doing this to save money, rather than to save the environment.”
“In terms of road accidents, we have to be sure that this won’t lead to more deaths and injuries on the roads, particularly for cyclists and pedestrians who are difficult to see at the best of times.”
“The statistical evidence shows that there are more fatal and serious accidents when roads are unlit.”
Hang on – isn’t it the ConDem govenment that are causing us to live in a country where we can’t afford to have street lights on?
Why do you think we are in this situation? Who was in Government previously? Why does Kirklees consider turning lights off and not every other council?